Petrucci Law
FREE CONSULTATION
CALL OR EMAIL US TODAY
PHILADELPHIA: 215-592-1120
BALA CYNWYD: 610-747-0440

Claimant’s Testimony Sufficient for Ongoing Disability

Claimant’s Testimony Sufficient for Ongoing Disability

While the recent opinions coming from the appellate courts have generally been favorable to the defense bar, a Commonwealth Court case just posted Wednesday, Pennsylvania Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund (PUEGF) v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Bonner and Fitzgerald), puts that trend on hold. In PUEGF, the court addressed a claimant’s burden of proof in a claim petition. Specifically, it had to decide whether the claimant’s medical expert’s speculative testimony regarding the injured worker’s ability to return to work six weeks after his last evaluation thwarted a claim for ongoing disability.

Occasionally, when litigating a claim petition for compensation benefits, the claimant must select as his medical expert a physician who is by no means skilled at rendering expert testimony. Despite one’s best efforts to prepare a doctor who is new to the world of trial testimony, sometimes statements made by a treating doctor undermine the burden of proof. Even one offhand comment can sometimes render expert testimony equivocal, making it impossible to meet one’s burden of proof.

Read more: http://www.thelegalintelligencer.com/id=1202642792646/Claimant%27s-Testimony-Sufficient-for-Ongoing-Disability#ixzz2ttszL4MH

Christian Petrucci

Leave a Reply